Pages

3/13/12

Horace Albright Lecture in Conservation

LECTURE The U.S. Farm Bill: What's at Stake


6:30PM Thursday, April 5th, 2012

Panel Discussion: Michael Pollan, Karen Ross, Ken Cook, Patricia Crawford, moderated by Gordon Rausser @ Wheeler Auditorium, UC Berkeley (free).

I don't usually like panel discussions, but sometimes they make for good introductions.

3/11/12

Rebellion

REBELLION via chickens, poetry

1. I figure rebellion, however small, is an important thing to be able to do on a day to day basis, not just for kicks, but a thing necessary to be honest or expressive or free or something like that.

2. On a billboard I've been driving by lately: If you want to be free, be free.

3. Attended a lecture last week by Joel Salatin on the importance of animals in human ecosystems.

1 + 2 + 3 = I want chickens (and fresh eggs).

A related poem: The Contrariness of the Mad Farmer by Wendell Berry

I am done with apologies. If contrariness is my
inheritance and destiny, so be it. If it is my mission
to go in at exits and come out at entrances, so be it.
I have planted by the stars in defiance of the experts,
and tilled somewhat by incantation and by singing,
and reaped, as I knew, by luck and Heaven’s favor,
in spite of the best advice. If I have been caught
so often laughing at funerals, that was because
I knew the dead were already slipping away,
preparing a comeback, and can I help it?
And if at weddings I have gritted and gnashed
my teeth, it was because I knew where the bridegroom
had sunk his manhood, and knew it would not
be resurrected by a piece of cake. “Dance” they told me,
and I stood still, and while they stood
quiet in line at the gate of the Kingdom, I danced.
“Pray” they said, and I laughed, covering myself
in the earth’s brightnesses, and then stole off gray
into the midst of a revel, and prayed like an orphan.
When they said “I know that my Redeemer liveth,”
I told them “He’s dead.” And when they told me
“God is dead,” I answered “He goes fishing every day
in the Kentucky River. I see Him often.”
When they asked me would I like to contribute
I said no, and when they had collected
more than they needed, I gave them as much as I had.
When they asked me to join them I wouldn’t,
and then went off by myself and did more
than they would have asked. “Well, then” they said
“go and organize the International Brotherhood
of Contraries,” and I said “Did you finish killing
everybody who was against peace?” So be it.
Going against men, I have heard at times a deep harmony
thrumming in the mixture, and when they ask me what
I say I don’t know. It is not the only or the easiest
way to come to the truth. It is one way.

A related quote by Albert Camus:

The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.

3/10/12

backyard

VISION backyard

braising greens
heirloom tomatoes
stepping stones
meyer lemon
bees + honey
aquatic plants
sweet peas
apricot foxglove
reading spot
wisteria
compost
sunshine
chickens




3/4/12

Social Networking

ENTERPRISE Nextdoor

note pinned to a wall

Online social networks like Facebook and related sites such as Pinterest and Spotify are providing platforms for people to connect and share, be it visual, musical, or intellectual. These platforms are dependent on existing social networks - personalities and communities - ultimately working to shape and evolve them. This season, Twitter and Facebook broadcasts Jeremy Lin. Last season, Twitter and Facebook broadcasts uprising in Egypt. We update, we comment, we like, we share.

My question is not focused on whether online social networking is valuable (it is), but rather on the question of paying for it. Presumably, it's free, but nothing ever is, and if I think too much about it, I realize that Pandora knows what I want to hear, Facebook knows who I want to 'stalk' and Blogger can read my every word, analyze, dissect it, and throw it back to me in an instant. Even if they are just algorithms, they are quiet and faceless, and someone is paying for them.

I recently read an article about a new start-up called Nextdoor. It's a social networking site based on building geographically local communities by connecting neighbors with one another to share information, trade materials, organize community events, etc. Tag line: 'the private social network for your neighborhood.' It's been compared to both Facebook and Craigslist. This comparison inspired my question - does it matter who pays for social networking? Is it okay to trade personal privacy for social networking tools?

Nextdoor sounds like a brilliant idea to facilitate community building, but who will pay for it? If the point of the network is to support and benefit local communities, how can it be funded and operated in a way that doesn't betray? While respecting independent personalities and communities as independent, private entities? I think it might depend on who is investing monetarily in these social networks - which companies - local or corporate. Or perhaps, the users themselves. I don't know, just questions.

Gardening with Christopher Walken

SKIT Googly Eyes


"A lot of people are putting googly eyes on their cactuses nowadays. I think it's because cactuses are dangerous. Cactuses have pricklers. They can stab you in your hands, see, the throat, the face. So, you need to know where you stand with them at all times."

(SNL, 2008)

2/26/12

fox mittens

LOVE OF THE DAY fox mittens + random sketching

warm hands = puppet hands!



parked & sketched, random house in Berkeley, CA, is it yours?

2/22/12

career night

PANEL Career Night @ Merritt College


Where is my education taking me? What employment opportunities are available to me? What ice cream flavor is better - *coconut or jasmine green tea? Q&A panel, meet & greet, discussion thing at the Horticulture Department next Tuesday, 2/28, 6-8PM.

* It's coconut! @ Tara's Organic Ice Cream on College Ave., Berkeley.